RSS Feed
Twitter
March 14th, 2010 
Ifydcat There is a thin line with these adverts in my opinion . What I mean is that 9 times out of ten they are showing a bare bottom of a small child . Now is this really any need considering the sick types of people that are out there nowadays to have this type of thing on the TV ,.,.., I mean we all know how and what nappies are used for .
youre thoughts.
Posted in 
Tags:
What are nappies?
wat s nappies?
Nappies are diapers, folks. And I don’t see anything wrong with showing a baby’s bare bottom (I really think it’s rare that someone would get turned on by it–or at least I hope it’s rare). It isn’t necessary, though. I just hope they don’t start showing women and old people’s bottoms when advertising feminine hygiene and incontinence products, lol.
The idea is that baby’s bottoms look cute so they appeal to the parent to buy the product.
It is also meant to show how your baby’s beautiful bottom is meant to be covered by that company’s beautiful nappy so they go together.
I think though if you wanted to say the baby’s bottom is beautiful why would you cover it with a nappy?
I agree with you this could be abused by watching perverts but if that is all they feel good about then really they are quite sad and nobody really cares.
Also how come poeple who use the word diaper don’t know what a nappy is but nearly all who use the word nappy know what a diaper is? For the people who asked “what’s a nappy?” stop being ignorant and learn